The God character and any references to churches will be removed from the film version of the "His Dark Materials" trilogy.
Which just strikes me as bloody stupid and a blatant attempt to bend over backwards to accomodate the wishes of the vocal religious loonies.
Zap2it report
Which just strikes me as bloody stupid and a blatant attempt to bend over backwards to accomodate the wishes of the vocal religious loonies.
Zap2it report
I read a detailed post about this.
Date: 2004-12-08 07:11 pm (UTC)In a way, it's kind of understandable
Date: 2004-12-08 07:45 pm (UTC)Not having read the books, I would probably suggest they either not adapt them for movies at all, or do them for a much smaller market, but that doesn't look like an option at this time.
I don't think this is a good thing, BTW, but unfortunately, it's an economic reality.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-08 08:09 pm (UTC)They do
Date: 2004-12-08 08:28 pm (UTC)Honestly, I think the money they pour into movies is out of control. If a movie costs $80 million to make, and $40 million to market, and $30 million to distribute, there's no possible way it can ever make a profit. But then you have something like "Lost in Translation," which was made for a few million, made $30 million internationally, and everyone's happy. There should be more films like that.