Angel: After The Fall - the poll
Apr. 27th, 2007 09:32 amBased on a new interview with Joss at Newsarama about the Angel season 6 comic books, I decided to do a poll (huzzah!). I know that the whole comic book canon issue is causing debate at the moment so I'm interested in knowing what people think. And if you want feel free to pimp the poll about the place, as I'd be very grateful.
Link to the new Joss interview
[Poll #974230]
Link to the new Joss interview
[Poll #974230]
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 10:58 am (UTC)I vote not...the canon finished in 2004, in the end of the series with NFA. Comics is only another type of fanfics
And the question 1...not vote, sorry. I dont love comics really.
A greeting and sorry by my little english :)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 12:02 pm (UTC)(here via
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 12:36 pm (UTC)The comic may not follow that plan exactly but it'll probably be along the lines of what was planned.
I'm looking forward to it, especially now I know Brian Lynch will be 'showrunning.' Spike: Asylum was far and away the best thing IDW have produced so far in the Angel franchise.
As for whether it's canon - yes it is, though I think I have it in a separate compartment in my head to show canon. Whether they'll ever link up, I'm not sure. It depends.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 04:10 pm (UTC)SPIKE/XANDER 4-EVAAA!!!!!!!!
P.S. tell your wife that it's my turn, she'd better send ASH back tout suite.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 08:09 pm (UTC)And I can hardly wait for the S6 Angel comics.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 09:58 pm (UTC)HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 04:36 am (UTC)And as always, in Joss I trust.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:16 am (UTC)Hell I'm just greedy.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-28 02:21 pm (UTC)MTV: Is there ever a danger in creating these new storylines that you paint yourself into a corner if or when you do a "Buffy" movie?
Whedon: At some point you have to let go of that fear. The movie audience is going to be different. In terms of a Buffy movie, both David [Boreanaz] and Sarah [Michelle Gellar] have pretty much got swinging careers and have never really wanted to revisit the characters anyway. It's doubtful that would happen. I never say never, and it would be fun to do it with them. I would be willing to overlook certain discrepancies. Ultimately, a movie would have to pick them up later in their lives anyway. I would have to fudge it with David, like "He got his mortality back for five years and then he lost it again," or something like that. I don't think anybody's going to mind that much if they get a movie.
I think it's a diplomatic version of "canon is what I want it to be at this particular moment" declaration. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 08:30 am (UTC)Aha! You should post that on the thread on Whedonesque, and see what they all have to say.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-29 05:13 pm (UTC)I think the discussion there was heated enough even without this quote. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 05:55 pm (UTC)