For those who follow fandom trends
Mar. 28th, 2009 10:16 pmWhedonesque has 2217 LJ users subscribing to its LJ feed. That figure hasn't really changed much in years.
At our MySpace site, there's 2594 friends. But we don't syndicate our feed there.
However on our Twitter feed, there's 3346 followers and thats rapidly climbing.
I think in the next few months we'll see a rapid fandom shift over to Twitter with most of the diehards going "wtf?".
At our MySpace site, there's 2594 friends. But we don't syndicate our feed there.
However on our Twitter feed, there's 3346 followers and thats rapidly climbing.
I think in the next few months we'll see a rapid fandom shift over to Twitter with most of the diehards going "wtf?".
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 10:25 pm (UTC)I'm still not sure what I feel about Twitter, like.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 10:59 pm (UTC)Twitter is one of the most aggravating ways of blogging possible IMO. Sadly not everyone is Stephen Fry for a start. *g*
When folks get bord with Twitter (like they've done with places such as Myspace etc, they'll move on, and LJ will still be here for those who are actually serious about communicating with people with the same interests. *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 05:16 am (UTC)I call them tweets. My recent annoyance is how little responses I get when I twitter at times. It always makes me wonder if anyone is paying any attention and if not, why should I bother? I just feel like all my postings are being lost in the ether. But then again, not many people comment when I post on LJ either.